Abre Los Ojos vs. Vanilla Sky
I brought and then watched both of these movies back-to-back. The first was done by a Chili-born Spanish director; the second the American remake. This is my argument on which is better. If you seen neither film, let me warn you some spoilers follows. If you want to know which I think is best over all, skip to the last paragraph.
Before I being, let me just state a few things to help out on any confusion, on an already confusing movie. There is four major characters. The main one is César/David, his initial girlfriend Nuria/Julie, his best friend Pelayo/Brian, and his girlfriend who César/David quickly developed a crush on, Sofia, played by Penélope Cruz in both films. It also helps to divide the film into four acts. The first one I like to call, this isn't in either film, "The Love Triangle", and it includes everything up to the crash. It shows how Nuria/Julie relationship ended - literally - with César/David when he got too interested in Pelayo/Brian's new girlfriend. The second "Disfigured", as César/David deals with his life after the wreak. The third act, "Surreal", starts when he wakes up with a hangover on the street, Sofia finding him there. The murder scene is the ending of that act and the beginning of the finale, which I just like to call "LE". Since Vanilla Sky (VS) is the remake, I will use it and compare it to Abre Los Ojos (ALO).
First of all, VS is the same film as ALO. No major plot changes, like you sometimes get. You can see the same scenes in both films, with one exception I noted. There was minor differences throughout, which I wll note below. VS is 18 minutes longer, mostly because it added a few things.
Take the first act. Julie had more on screen time than Nuria, though not too much. We also see a lot more of David's business as the leader of a magazine publishing company and the '7 dwarves' he has to work with, unlike César's chain or restaurants. Pointing out David's playboy lifestyle as a weakness is hinted at through frequent use of the word marriage and one common line throughout the film. To quote Brian (ugh, rarely do I see my name used in a movie... not use to it!) in the birthday party, "Just remember, the sweet is never as sweet without the sour, and I know the sour." Finally the drive just before the crash was longer, more exciting, and meaningful. I like those elements. What I didn't like is Sofia seeming to be more infatuated with David unlike ALO. In ALO she says through her actions that he won't mind being friends with César since they share a friend in common, but she is Pelayo's. Since this deals with one of the main themes of this movie, I have to go with ALO on this act by a little. Oh, and Sofia has a dog instead of a cat. Noticed that in both films this is the only scene you see her pet.
In act 2, VS has David's arm injured in addition to is face disfigurement. I like the scene with the surgeons more. "Because for a minute there, I thought we were talking about A F***ING MASK! .... This completely takes care of Halloween. But what about the other 364 days of the year?" Sofia isn't a mime but a dancer. At first this didn't seem to matter till I noticed one scene they just took out. Here is the one scene that don't have a scene in VS. In ALO, César watched her mime until it started to rain, washing her makeup off. She started to put things away and César asks why she won't talk or look at him, placing the blame on the fact he is now disfigured. The scene doesn't end well for either of them. What VS did instead is David following Sofia dressed up so that she can't tell that is him, and just watching her from a distance. In a later scene - they are not connected - he reintroduce himself and ends okay for them both. I prefer the ALO version a lot more, and my vote goes for ALO for this act. Well, there is one other good line for VS, at the end of the bar scenes. In ALO, Pelayo just shows up saying he was looking for him (César) and they leave. VS has Sofia saying, "I'll tell you in another life, when we are both cats.", which amuses David.
"Surreal" is when the movie gets really confusing. People begin to quote David and others, like in ALO. VS adds a mole to Sofia's breast which plays a role in the murder scene. Little, but a nice touch. Also I seem to like Najwa Nimri acting more than Cameron Diaz for Nuria/Julie. Diaz acting was a little too much while Nimri seem more level. When she was reintroduced in this act, Julie was not hit and, though initially disturbed by David's actions, laughed at the end of the scene. Later, when David's best ally in his company (a character who didn't exist in ALO) came to get him out, shown Julie's face bloodied. Also on Nuria/Julie, I like how ALO was more 'sneaky'. Think this is Cameron trying to play mind games with us, like the movie does with David. The French TV announcer of LE was replaced by a British actor who played an official from tech support. The dream sequence in LE's headquarters are much better in ALO since the visuals are fuzzed out like they really are a dream or a memory.
As for the murder scene, again I like Nimri acting compared to Diaz when Nuria/Julie attacked him (what happened to the dog in VS?!?) and how Amenábar is more sneaky with Nuria/Julie reintroduced after a brief period of her back to being Sofia again. As for the murder itself, for whatever reason, I like VS better. More dynamic, played out, and maybe because he covers up Diaz over-smiling face. And was that 'Western Union' being played?!? No one gets murdered when David goes to LE's headquarters. Instead of going to the bathroom saying "This is a nightmare", he notices the one doing the sales pitch quoting him, so he says the exact thing she is saying and pull off his mask there. He then runs out and started screaming for tech support. Very funny. I actually like this act more in VS than in ALO, how it wraps up all the loose ends. The only thing I don't like is that it tells what happened after David is put into ice. This was never revealed in ALO, and it hinted Sofia was the right person for David.
This is perhaps the biggest difference between the two films. In my opinion, ALO's Sofia was meant for Pelayo. The reverse for VS, which shows in the before mentioned scene Brian just giving Sofia a wave during David's memorial service, and she just leaves.
So what is my final verdict? I tend to lean to ALO. Besides for the list of specific reasons I mentioned, Amenábar directing (again, how surprises sneak up on you) and the script did a better job in setting up the puzzle for the viewers to solve while laying down enough clues to do so. Like the LE TV person versus a dog in VS, and the fuzzled memory sequence showing César's original trip there. ALO is also more like what a psychological horror movie should be. It was darker and only became an action film when César lost it in the end. Overall I do like both films, I just prefer ALO by a slim margin.
4 Comments:
Reading your blog and I figured you'd be interested in advancing your life a bit, call us at 1-206-339-5106. No tests, books or exams, easiest way to get a Bachelors, Masters, MBA, Doctorate or Ph.D in almost any field.
Totally confidential, open 24 hours a day.
Hope to hear from you soon!
Insteads of the mime sequence VS replaces that with David walking in on Sophia's ballet class. She isn't horrified like she is in ALO though, which kind of bothered me. I liked the fact that she was disturbed by his disfigured face...in both cases though she accepts his invite to the club.
I too have just watched both films within a day of each other. I had been a fan of VS first, so I knew I was always going to be a little biased about prefering this version. Here is my tuppence worth:
I thought ALO revealed the concept a little too early. Of course it is difficult for me to truly assess this, as I'm familiar with the storyline, but I still come to this conclusion. You prefer the ALO script for allowing the puzzle to be solved for the viewer and that in your view ALO does this better. However I think VS disguises the puzzle more successfully, it is less of a obvious 'cue' earlier in the film. I feel the billy the dog/L.E. clips and so on were placed as a bit more incidentally and were therefore not as obvious. There was more time dedicated to clues in ALO and that does make it an 'easier' film. In my view, VS is better for it, as it prolongs the mystery and therefore engages the mind more; further it heightens the enjoyment of the film as the plot is skillfully revealed with a 'wow' moment, akin to a M Night Shylaman film or 'Fight club.'
Secondly: I love the revelation at the end of VS where it references Jules et Jim. Of course I had to watch that. I think Cameron Crowe deserves some plaudits for inserting the references to this film. I assume it must be a homage to the fact that Alejandro Amenabar and Mateo Gill must have been inspired to some degree by this 1962 french film to construct ALO. There are some notable similarities, such as the friendship torn by a woman, the car leaving the bridge (notable again that in VS it is a bridge like Jules et Jim) and the idea that love is a powerful and destructive force in life (note the Goethe and Baudelaire quotes in Jules et Jim).
Thirdly; It is interesting that P. Cruz plays both films. She doesn't play it exactly the same, though it is the same part. The dynamics between the characters is more like a dance, quirky, short and snappy, with more body language (intrestingly, she is a dancer in VS whereas she was an actress in ALO). It seems like life is a series of clips, of moments (again some similarity to Jules et Jim) but then I admit that maybe that's not deliberate, maybe that's just my interpretation. I also prefer Kurt Russel as the psychologist in VS. His role as a father figure is of more relevance and is a better piece of the puzzle in VS.
Lastly, You observe that Sofia belongs to Brian/Pelayo, and you prefer ALO for that reason. For me, I think VS is the better for Sofia being a missed oportunity for David, The roof scene, the use of: "When we're both cats" to the Sigur Ros soundtrack and the vivid, dream-like Vanilla Sky to me is a beautiful scene. A work of art how the threads are knitted together at that moment to express how we are at the mercy of fate. That makes the story a more convincing 'tradgedy.' In VS, sofia being a missed oportunity for David is a tradegy and so is the more perfect story than ALO. Now that I have seen Jules et Jim and see that this film was a commentary on how we are slaves to fate and how destructive love can be, I've no doubt that VS achieves this better and it seems that Cameron Crowe set out to do that.
VS is only good because of ALO, of course, but it seems to me Cameron Crowe remade that film not just to make another version to to create something beautiful to come together on the roof like that. The whole concept of the 'vanilla sky' is wonderful, 'grey skies are gonna clear up..' In fact I have just remembered that there is the scene when happiness is at its highest ebb in Jules et Jim and the description is 'we were so close to the sky,' or words to that effect. For me VS is more dreamlike and just that bit more perfect, vivid and beautiful (beautifully tradgic) than ALO.
And it starts with Radiohead..! Need In say more? Two radiohead tracks in VS.
Stan Hughes
Perth
Scotland
As a huge fan of ALO, I gotta say, it's much better than VS for so many reasons. The acting in VS is so overacted, not just Cameron Diaz vs Nuria, it's everyone! Tom Cruise is overdoing it half the time, the friend, even Penelope Cruz with her ecstatic jumping on the coach etc - things that are hinted at in ALO, but the actors act like adults not high school kids that fell in love after 10 min (even though Cesar says, he felt he loved her when he visited her apartment, but he doesn't act it out like a kid).
Not just that, but one addition you didn't mention is the funeral for David in VS: nonexistent in ALO because...Cesar/David are frozen so how would anyone know? LE is gonna go investigate for him? they don't care, they just freeze the body at death. Also it adds a lot more heaviness through mystery: did Sofia care, how much, did she go back to Pelayo? I disagree that she was Pelayo's in ALO - she clearly tells Cesar that he's backstabbing his friend and Cesar says Pelayo would do the same (lul), and they kiss. Nuria's whole rage is because she was never even half at that level with Cesar and she slept with him whereas this girl didn't.
VS just seems like such a disjointed copy of ALO. I'm glad they didn't change the plot, but so many little things just make no sense. For example, in ALO the psychiatrist and Cesar walk alone and he tells the confused lady it's his son and he's shy, so they see the lucid dream person. In VS he says the same thing...with the cop right behind him....Ummm yeah, like anyone's gonna believe it lol.
overall VS is a typical example of Hollywood overexaggerated acting and characters explaining things by talking instead of body language and subtlety like ALO. The one thing I like VS more is the mole like you mention, very subtle Chekhov's gun. And the way David reconnects with Sofia is a lot more subtle - makes some good jokes, "Today I woke up and, hey! A good hair day" lol. But I mean they butchered the nightclub scene so bad in VS. When you watch in ALO I was reminded of every girl that didn't like me in real life and couldn't wait to leave even though I'm not disfigured (much?)! In VS Sofia was like a punished kid, and then at the end runs away into the night lol what the heck.
The only other thing I disagree with you is that VS ties up the ending better. In fact the whole movie but esp the ending is so much more confusing in VS. In ALO they perfectly explain everything quickly and clearly. They show how the dream overlaps shortly before real life ended with the sticks, in VS you're wondering what's going on before David suddenly runs outside like a loon because the lady also mentions Jules Verne (a normal person would find it odd but would not jump to that conclusion so quickly, but hey Tom Cruise is a secret agent for MI6, maybe it was instinct :D ).
ALO does hint at the technological marvel that it's the year 2145, but I thought that didn't ruin it: Cesar will have the normal life he wanted, but without Sofia (or Pelayo). Perfect ending to this with the question of whether that's better than being with Sofia, a question whose answer is no longer relevant because he can't choose anymore. It's both a happy and sad ending at the same time: fixed face, love lost forever.
Post a Comment
<< Home